|
In 1976, the Southern
Regional Education Board conducted a survey of over 300
human service training programs throughout the country
to obtain information on program content and
characteristics. The purpose of the survey was to
obtain baseline data upon which to make decisions
concerning program standards. Support for the project
was provided by a grant from the National Institute for
Mental Health.
Results
of the survey indicated several areas of significant
agreement among programs training purposes, field
experience requirements, generic skills for working in
human services, interdisciplinary faculty
characteristics, and common program policies.
These findings were used by a task force of educators
who met to recommend proposed program standards and
develop an assessment model. The task force produced the
format and general content areas of the standards.
The
proposed standards were field tested for language and
clarity before general distribution. In 1978, the
proposed standards were mailed to over 1100 faculty
members of human service programs and a group of service
providers and graduates for their reactions. Respondents
were asked to rate the acceptability and appropriateness
of each standard and provide additional comments as
warranted
The
result of this process was the National Standards for
Human Service Education and Training Programs. They are
intentionally general to strike a balance between
clearly stated principles and enough flexibility to
avoid constraining natural diversity among programs.
In
1979, the Council for Standards in Human Service
Education was established to give focus and direction to
education and training in mental health and human
services throughout the country. The Council
exists to help human service educators and college
administrators who are interested in achieving maximum
educational effectiveness and to formally recognize and
approve programs whose competence warrants public and
professional confidence..
The
accreditation process is designed to assist programs in
selfstudy, evaluation, and continual improvement and to
produce new, creative approaches to the preparation of
human service practitioners at all levels. The Council
accreditation attests to a program's compliance with the
Standards.
In
1983, after several years experience in using the
Standards in the program accreditation process, the
Council Board of Directors authorized the formation of a
task force to review and recommend revisions to the
Standards. The task force's charge was to clarify the
differentiation between advanced and associate degree
programs and to create a new technical (nondegree
granting) program level. The task force included faculty
from colleges offering programs at each of the three
levels and training personnel from human service
delivery agencies. The result of the task force's
effort was mailed to all members of the Council for
review and comment. These comments were used as the
basis for the following proposed revision of the
Standards for Human Service Worker Education and
Training Programs.
In
1996 a survey was conducted at the annual NOHSE
conference to determine if practicum hour standards were
still in line with community and academic needs.
Survey analysis
indicated that revisions were in order. A committee was
established to review and make the recommendations that
have been incorporated into the standards.
|